1.1.1 Our system of Government is a parliamentary democracy consisting of three related components, the legislature, the executive, and the judiciary. Each component (including the public service which is the administrative arm of the executive government) is established and operates in accordance with the rule of law.
1.1.2 As public officials, we are required to faithfully serve the elected Government of the day by:
The following sections outline the standards you must adopt in your daily work for the Department.
All staff should promptly, conscientiously and effectively comply with all lawful and reasonable decisions and directions from their supervisor, a delegated authority, or employing authority. You shall not knowingly or deliberately by overt or covert acts or omissions impede compliance or implementation of a lawful and reasonable decision or direction.
A supervisor shall make competent decisions, be open to positive and constructive questions about their direction, give guidance and directions to an employee that are fair and reasonable, having regard to their legal and organisational responsibilities and delegations.You are encouraged to be receptive to constructive feedback about how you can better achieve the Department's mission and objectives.
Consistent with this approach, you are entitled to challenge or question a decision or direction if you believe it to be unlawful, unethical, unfair or unreasonable.
Before challenging or questioning a decision or direction (that does not involve misconduct), you should seek to discuss the matter with your supervisor and attempt to understand the basis for the decision or direction. You should only then express the reasons for your concerns or reservations about the decision or direction. Trivial and vexatious objections are unacceptable.
Wherever possible, the person whose decision or direction is challenged or questioned by a staff member should listen to their concerns and reservations, then review their decision or direction in the light of this discussion.
If your concerns remain unresolved after this review, you may communicate your objection to more senior officers in the Department. You may elect to use the Department's grievance procedure, if attempts at informal resolution are unsuccessful or would be inappropriate to use in the circumstances.
If you reasonably believe the instruction or decision involves criminal activity, official misconduct or maladministration, you are to instead notify the Department's Crime and Misconduct Commission (CMC) Liaison Officer or another appropriate authority immediately (e.g. the Crime and Misconduct Commission, the Queensland Police Service, the Ombudsman's Office). The Director, Ethical Standards, is the Department's CMC Liaison Officer and Public Interest Disclosure Contact Officer.
You are obliged to comply with decisions or directions while consideration is given to your objection, except when:
Under Section 5 of the Public Service Regulation 2007
(new window)
you are obligated to immediately provide details to the Department if you are charged with, or convicted of, an indictable offence (e.g. stealing, assault, sexual offences etc.) or convicted of any offence. The Department will consider whether disciplinary or other action needs to occur because of the charge or conviction. For advice on these matters contact Ethical Standards.
Staff are reminded of their obligations under the Queensland College of Teachers Act 2005
(new window)
and the Commission for Children and Young People and Child Guardian Act 2000
(new window)
to notify relevant managers and agencies if there is a "change in an employee's criminal history ", i.e. an employee is charged with or convicted of an offence.
A teacher disagrees with the decision of their principal to allocate school funds to one project in preference to another. The teacher invites the principal to share her thinking behind the decision. The teacher describes his concerns about the implications if the other project is not funded. The principal listens to the concerns and discusses possible options with the teacher. After further discussion, the principal acknowledges the teacher's concerns, but finds her original decision should stand. The decision is lawful, ethical, fair and reasonable. The teacher complies with the action required to implement the decision.
An employee asks his supervisor if he can use their accrued time entitlement next Friday. The supervisor declines to approve the request explaining that some new and unexpected urgent work needs to be completed by the following Monday. The supervisor suggests that the employee take a day off after this deadline. The employee is unhappy with this decision, does not attend for duty on Friday, and claims accrued time on his time sheet. The employee has engaged in misconduct and would be liable for disciplinary action.
Copyright |
Disclaimer |
Privacy |
Access keys |
Other languages
© The State of Queensland (Department of Education and Training) 2006.