| Education Queensland | EQ home | EQ search | EQ site map |
![]() |
| Online learning | Communication | Communities | Curriculum Exchange |
|
|
October 2003
A Model for conducting online expert roundtables
by Michelle Williams
The background![]() Michelle Williams on a Field trip sitting in the Shelfo river … charging up the batteries of laptops in a land cruiser and camping out. Within different professional communities and workplaces in a large organisation, people work on common ideas even though they do not always have opportunity to share expertise and work together. Further, geographic distances and workplace schedules often reduce the opportunity to access collegial expertise. An online roundtable is a strategy which enables dispersed professionals to work together over a period of time without needing to allocate concentrated face–to–face time and travel resources. The increasing use of online strategies for professional work and learning means that people have the skills, knowledge and dispositions to work comfortably online in asynchronous activities. There is also an increasing understanding of online facilitation strategies which promote online professional conversations. The roundtable metaphor promotes evenness amongst participants. It feels like people would have equal opportunity to share expertise and that a facilitator would support the sharing process. It is also usual that a roundtable would result in a product – either recommendations for action or consensus on a shared product which is usable at least, by the members of the roundtable. The process of expert roundtables is also likely to move knowledge forward in the field, as the synergy of experts shapes new frontiers and new ideas. This model then for online expert roundtables, responds to the context of distributed expertise, takes advantage of developing technology–mediated practices and capitalizes on the powerful roundtable metaphor to create a strategy for experts to collaborate on projects which will lead their professional community forward. The scenarioAt this point in time, people with expertise in their area of responsibility may have varying levels of experience at working online. Those working in small face–to–face teams and teachers working in schools, may not spend much time working online. The level of experience is uneven everywhere. Further, the nature of people’s work, their working styles and interrelationships, mean that they use a variety of ‘modes’ to work with others; speaking face–to–face, speaking by phone, participating in teleconferences, sharing information in documents, using email and bulletin boards and using online spaces deliberately designed for teams of people to work together. People will have preferred ways of communicating and sharing expertise within task designs. Being online all the time may not work yet, but will increasingly, as online experiences continue to gain popularity. For a professional community to grow in its knowledge and mature in its practices, it needs to draw on its expertise. It is likely that these experts provide leadership in a professional community and set directions. They will take risks to explore and try out new ideas that others will value. The potential for capitalizing on expertise is great, though taking advantage of the synergy is a complex but powerful ambition. However, communications technologies provide the tools which enable distributed experts to collaborate. They may need support to learn how to work this way and they will need facilitation to capitalise on their knowledge. Working through phone and Internet networks with a dispersed team, does take longer than working face to face. The working progress on a project seems fragmented and asynchronous. For participants, the work on any one project is dispersed amongst multiple simultaneous projects and often may feel fragmented and elongated. However, it is often in this modern era, commonplace to work in what could be described as a multi–tasking environment. Using communications media to share conversations and documents is increasingly commonplace and combined with synchronous meetings of people in teams, ideas mature and progress when all people are committed to the process and eventual products or outcomes. There is an increasing understanding of how to work in a modern connected context, especially as people work practices change and become reliant on communications technologies. This model for capitalizing on distributed expertise, does account for the varying levels of comfort with working asynchronously and with Internet–based technologies. It is a facilitated model. This model assumes that busy people dropping into a reasonably long asynchronous conversation, will value a strong facilitator role which seeks to balance the time required for busy experts to formalize their contributions and their desire to have strong input. The model in a nutshellThis model involves a facilitator preparing the materials, sharing them online in multiple ways and conducting rounds of professional conversation, working towards a final product which will be distributed publicly. The design of the model divides activities into three groups: preparation activities, the online round table itself and the follow up processes to complete the activity. Some activities are completed by the facilitator, others involve individual participants and some, the whole group. This model assumes use of the Learning Place Project Rooms or a similar space, to store materials and record/conduct conversations. The model explainedPreparation activities
Online roundtable
Post Round tablePublish the original problem, process and products.
Distribute products for use by the broader educational community.
Selecting media for various communication and other tasksThe facilitator will have to select media that accounts for the level of expertise and the preferred working styles of participants. The use of online tools and the proportion of online activity will need to be negotiated. Sufficient time will need to be provided to enable participants to develop familiarity and undertake preparation. The following suggests the fit between tools and conversations and other activities.
Resources to assist in developing a roundtableFrangenheim, E, Reflections on Classroom Thinking Strategies, Rodin Educational Consultancy, Australia, 1998. These classroom thinking strategies also work in professional development settings. The E–Lesson Learning Planner also describes these strategies. Adopting these to online strategies is not documented though anecdotal stories are shared amongst online facilitators. Searching the Curriculum Exchange and EdNA for the following terms would provide background information on facilitation strategies which could be modified for use in online expert roundtables.
Flexible Learning Network (2003). Flexible Learning Network Quick
Guides
What have
we learnt
about … Effective
Online Facilitation.
http://www.flexiblelearning.net.au/guides/facilitation.pdf This summarises the key lessons from the VET sector in online teaching. The issues and references in this excellent guide will assist facilitators of Online Round tables to think about techniques for including participants and how to set tone and purpose. Searching the Curriculum Exchange and EdNA for the following terms will reveal a raft of background materials and strategies for hosting online events.
AcknowledgementThis project was funded by the Commonwealth Department of Education, Science and Training as a quality teacher initiative under the Commonwealth Quality Teacher Programme |
Search
Logon to
Join
Contact us
What's on?
|
Copyright |
Disclaimer |
Acceptable use |
Privacy |
Internet linking |
Access keys |
Other languages
© The State of Queensland (Department of Education and Training) 2009.