One-off programs rarely have lasting results in schools. An integrated approach is much more likely to achieve real and ongoing progress.
The following 'five step' model is based on the work of Connell (1999):
Enlist students and staff in the collection of a range of data to be analysed by gender. Data could include:
Look for ways to end gender oppositions and divisions, such as
Consistently focus on achieving better social and academic outcomes by studying gender relations across the curriculum. Rather than developing separate 'gender studies' or working only within the humanities, rethink maths, science and computer studies with a gender focus. This is especially important so that gender construction is seen as 'real learning' for boys whose narrow subject choices limit their opportunities to explore these issues.
Where specific 'hotspots' or problems have been identified there may be a place for special purpose programs dealing with specific issues such as sexual harassment, homophobia and other forms of bullying. Such programs should involve both boys and girls, as both benefit from learning how prevailing versions of masculinity dominate the ways boys and girls enact their gender identities.
Periodically return to step 1 and look at data to gauge progress on issues such as disciplinary action, behaviour, retention rates, social and academic outcomes. Listen to feedback from the school community.
Questionnaires are an effective tool if well designed but if not can be time consuming and produce low-grade information. Good models are available in Gender and School Education (Collins et al. 1996), Enough's enough! (Education Queensland 1994), Gender Up Front (Association of Women Educators 1997) and No Fear (Department of Employment, Education and Training 1995).
Copyright |
Disclaimer |
Privacy |
Access keys |
Other languages
© The State of Queensland (Department of Education, Training and the Arts) 2002.