content-left-bg.png
content-right-bg.png
Zone 0 WebPart Area
Zone 0 - (12)
Zone 0 - (3|3|3|3)
WebPartZone0_3x3x3x3_1
WebPartZone0_3x3x3x3_2
WebPartZone0_3x3x3x3_3
WebPartZone0_3x3x3x3_4
Zone 0 - (4|4|4)
WebPartZone0_4x4x4_1
WebPartZone0_4x4x4_2
WebPartZone0_4x4x4_3
Zone 0 - (8|4)
WebPartZone0_8x4_1
WebPartZone0_8x4_2
Zone 0 - (6|6)
WebPartZone0_6x6_1
WebPartZone0_6x6_2
Zone 0 - (4|8)
WebPartZone0_4x8_1
WebPartZone0_4x8_2
Zone 1 WebPart Area
Zone 1 - Publishing Page Content + Above/Below Content
WebPartZone1_1
PublishingPageContent

The free milk scheme was first introduced into Queensland state schools in 1953 as an initiative of the Commonwealth government.

Origins

The scheme originated in the work of Dr Cory Mann in Britain in the mid 1920s. His work was applied successfully in different countries in the early 1930s when economic depression focused attention on nutrition. In Queensland, depression era governments examined the idea. However, teachers opposed it on the grounds that distributing milk and collecting bottles and money would take too much teaching time.

At the State Education convention in 1941, the British Medical Association (BMA) raised the issue again. The BMA's, Dr Noel Gutteridge proposed a scheme to provide a daily ration of milk to all school children comprising one half pint.

He proclaimed the health value of milk highlighting that a ration of milk:

  • doubled the normal growth rate of children
  • had positive effects on behaviour at school, athletic prowess, absenteeism and dental health.

Economic motives also underpinned the advocacy of free milk. Milk production in the early 1940s had reached an historic high without a corresponding increase in milk consumption or exports of butter. School milk schemes would distribute this surplus cheaply.

No attendee at the 1942 Education convention opposed the idea of increased milk consumption among children. However, the Queensland Teachers' Union was concerned that the scheme placed a large additional burden on teachers and instead, urged an education campaign in schools.

In July 1950, the Prime Minister of Australia, Robert Menzies raised the matter of a free milk scheme in a letter to State premiers. Commonwealth and State health ministers met in Canberra and prepared guidelines for implementing the scheme. The Commonwealth Department of Health would operate the scheme with State authorities acting as agents. In December 1950, the Commonwealth's State Grants (Milk for School Children) Act was passed and by October 1951 all Australian states, with the exception of Queensland were participating in the scheme.

In Queensland, the Hanlon government raised concerns about aspects of the scheme as inappropriate in a State with a tropical climate and huge distances between centres. An Agreement was later signed and the scheme began operating in the greater Brisbane area on 3 March 1953. The scheme was extended later that year to country centres and it was estimated that 150,000 Queensland school children were consuming 30,000 gallons of free milk each week.

Implementing the scheme was a significant exercise in interdepartmental collaboration. It was planned and supervised by an inter-departmental committee. The Department of Public Instruction (later Education) was largely responsible for the day-to-day tasks of administration and organization including:

  • processing of tenders for the supply of milk and drinking straws
  • comparison of school statements of actual supply with vendors claims
  • supply and consignment arrangements
  • record keeping related to all of the activities.

Dubious pleasure

Teachers and children of the 1950s and 1960s will remember that the milk was supplied in small bottles containing one third of a pint. Plain drinking straws were provided.

The insertion of the straw into the bottle was challenging. The bottle was almost impossible to open by normal means, which was downward pressure under the palm of the hand followed by a twisting motion. It would open by the 'thumb through the lid' strategy. Use of the thumb was problematic as it had to be discreet given that it was forbidden. The secret was not always well kept as it could be explosively messy.

Taste

The taste of the free school milk will remain vividly in the memory of school children from this era. The milk was never refrigerated and on a hot Queensland day, the taste it had acquired by 'little lunch' could be sickening. Enjoyment was not improved if you forgot to shake the bottle before opening and got a mouthful of warm, sometimes lumpy cream. Some fortunate children brought flavouring to school to add to the milk to make it more palatable.

A voluntary activity

Free milk consumption was a voluntary activity. Parents had to give permission for their child's participation. The scheme was limited to children under the age of thirteen at the time of application. It was thought that children beyond this age would benefit less.

Conclusion

The Review of the Continuing Expenditure Policies of the Previous Government, the Coombs Report (June 1973) presented to the Commonwealth government recommended that the scheme be discontinued. According to the Coombs Report, this recommendation was based on significant agreement among health authorities that the continuation of the free milk scheme could not be justified on nutritional grounds. Benefits to the diet were likely to be minimal beyond the age of 7. The scheme ended in 1973.

A new scheme

After receiving many requests for the scheme to be re-introduced, the Queensland Cabinet decided to introduce a new system for all pre-school children in January 1978. Pre-school children had to be in regular attendance at both State and non-State centres. It was established as a State initiative by the Department of Education. By August 1984, this scheme supplied cartons containing 150 mls of milk to children in 1,638 participating centres. They comprised 582 government centres including pre-schools, special pre-schools and early education centres and 1,086 non-government comprising mostly kindergartens, family day centres, day care centres and playgroups.

Discontinuation

The highly decentralised nature of the scheme led to high administrative costs. It was decided that these funds would be used elsewhere in the 1987–88 budget. The State Free Milk Subsidy Scheme ceased from the end of the 1987 school year.

WebPartZone1_2
Zone 1 - (12)
WebPartZone1_12
Zone 1 - (3|3|3|3)
WebPartZone1_3x3x3x3_1
WebPartZone1_3x3x3x3_2
WebPartZone1_3x3x3x3_3
WebPartZone1_3x3x3x3_4
Zone 1 - (4|4|4)
WebPartZone1_4x4x4_1
WebPartZone1_4x4x4_2
WebPartZone1_4x4x4_3
Zone 1 - (8|4)
WebPartZone1_8x4_1
WebPartZone1_8x4_2
Zone 1 - (6|6)
WebPartZone1_6x6_1
WebPartZone1_6x6_2
Zone 1 - (4|8)
WebPartZone1_4x8_1
WebPartZone1_4x8_2
Zone 2 WebPart Area
Zone 2 - (12)
WebPartZone2_12
Zone 2 - (3|3|3|3)
WebPartZone2_3x3x3x3_1
WebPartZone2_3x3x3x3_2
WebPartZone2_3x3x3x3_3
WebPartZone2_3x3x3x3_4
Zone 2 - (4|4|4)
WebPartZone2_4x4x4_1
WebPartZone2_4x4x4_2
WebPartZone2_4x4x4_3
Zone 2 - (8|4)
WebPartZone2_8x4_1
WebPartZone2_8x4_2
Zone 2 - (6|6)
WebPartZone2_6x6_1
WebPartZone2_6x6_2
Zone 2 - (4|8)
WebPartZone2_4x8_1
WebPartZone2_4x8_2
Zone 3 WebPart Area
Zone 3 - (12)
WebPartZone3_12
Zone 3 - (3|3|3|3)
WebPartZone3_3x3x3x3_1
WebPartZone3_3x3x3x3_2
WebPartZone3_3x3x3x3_3
WebPartZone3_3x3x3x3_4
Zone 3 - (4|4|4)
WebPartZone3_4x4x4_1
WebPartZone3_4x4x4_2
WebPartZone3_4x4x4_3
Zone 3 - (8|4)
WebPartZone3_8x4_1
WebPartZone3_8x4_2
Zone 3 - (6|6)
WebPartZone3_6x6_1
WebPartZone3_6x6_2
Zone 3 - (4|8)
WebPartZone3_4x8_1
WebPartZone3_4x8_2
Zone 4 WebPart Area
Zone 4 - (12)
WebPartZone4_12
Zone 4 - (3|3|3|3)
WebPartZone4_3x3x3x3_1
WebPartZone4_3x3x3x3_2
WebPartZone4_3x3x3x3_3
WebPartZone4_3x3x3x3_4
Zone 4 - (4|4|4)
WebPartZone4_4x4x4_1
WebPartZone4_4x4x4_2
WebPartZone4_4x4x4_3
Zone 4 - (8|4)
WebPartZone4_8x4_1
WebPartZone4_8x4_2
Zone 4 - (6|6)
WebPartZone4_6x6_1
WebPartZone4_6x6_2
Zone 4 - (4|8)
WebPartZone4_4x8_1
WebPartZone4_4x8_2
Zone 5 WebPart Area
Zone 5 - (12)
WebPartZone5_12
Zone 5 - (3|3|3|3)
WebPartZone5_3x3x3x3_1
WebPartZone5_3x3x3x3_2
WebPartZone5_3x3x3x3_3
WebPartZone5_3x3x3x3_4
Zone 5 - (4|4|4)
WebPartZone5_4x4x4_1
WebPartZone5_4x4x4_2
WebPartZone5_4x4x4_3
Zone 5 - (8|4)
WebPartZone5_8x4_1
WebPartZone5_8x4_2
Zone 5 - (6|6)
WebPartZone5_6x6_1
WebPartZone5_6x6_2
Zone 5 - (4|8)
WebPartZone5_4x8_1
WebPartZone5_4x8_2
Zone 6 WebPart Area
Zone 6 - (12)
WebPartZone6_12
Zone 6 - (3|3|3|3)
WebPartZone6_3x3x3x3_1
WebPartZone6_3x3x3x3_2
WebPartZone6_3x3x3x3_3
WebPartZone6_3x3x3x3_4
Zone 6 - (4|4|4)
WebPartZone6_4x4x4_1
WebPartZone6_4x4x4_2
WebPartZone6_4x4x4_3
Zone 6 - (8|4)
WebPartZone6_8x4_1
WebPartZone6_8x4_2
Zone 6 - (6|6)
WebPartZone6_6x6_1
WebPartZone6_6x6_2
Zone 6 - (4|8)
WebPartZone6_4x8_1
WebPartZone6_4x8_2
Zone 7 WebPart Area
Zone 7 - (12)
WebPartZone7_12
Zone 7 - (3|3|3|3)
WebPartZone7_3x3x3x3_1
WebPartZone7_3x3x3x3_2
WebPartZone7_3x3x3x3_3
WebPartZone7_3x3x3x3_4
Zone 7 - (4|4|4)
WebPartZone7_4x4x4_1
WebPartZone7_4x4x4_2
WebPartZone7_4x4x4_3
Zone 7 - (8|4)
WebPartZone7_8x4_1
WebPartZone7_8x4_2
Zone 7 - (6|6)
WebPartZone7_6x6_1
WebPartZone7_6x6_2
Zone 7 - (4|8)
WebPartZone7_4x8_1
WebPartZone7_4x8_2
Zone 8 WebPart Area
Zone 8 - (12)
WebPartZone8_12
Zone 8 - (3|3|3|3)
WebPartZone8_3x3x3x3_1
WebPartZone8_3x3x3x3_2
WebPartZone8_3x3x3x3_3
WebPartZone8_3x3x3x3_4
Zone 8 - (4|4|4)
WebPartZone8_4x4x4_1
WebPartZone8_4x4x4_2
WebPartZone8_4x4x4_3
Zone 8 - (8|4)
WebPartZone8_8x4_1
WebPartZone8_8x4_2
Zone 8 - (6|6)
WebPartZone8_6x6_1
WebPartZone8_6x6_2
Zone 8 - (4|8)
WebPartZone8_4x8_1
WebPartZone8_4x8_2
Zone 9 WebPart Area
Zone 9 - (12)
WebPartZone9_1
Zone 9 - (3|3|3|3)
WebPartZone9_3x3x3x3_1
WebPartZone9_3x3x3x3_2
WebPartZone9_3x3x3x3_3
WebPartZone9_3x3x3x3_4
Zone 9 - (4|4|4)
WebPartZone9_4x4x4_1
WebPartZone9_4x4x4_2
WebPartZone9_4x4x4_3
Zone 9 - (8|4)
WebPartZone9_8x4_1
WebPartZone9_8x4_2
Zone 9 - (6|6)
WebPartZone9_6x6_1
WebPartZone9_6x6_2
Zone 9 - (4|8)
WebPartZone9_4x8_1
WebPartZone9_4x8_2
Last updated 22 January 2026